Tuesday, September 24, 2013


Ma, Zhaodong
Professor Klepper
English 113B
September 23, 2013
The Battle Between Internet and Copyright
    Since internet was created, it became the most effective and fast way to work and study. Internet change the way that people used to live, while at the same time people give internet more features to help people share their life. You can find anything you want on the internet in few seconds and enjoy the convenience and speedy. However, you may receive an indictment from someone or some company saying that you are not legal to read or listen some materials because they have the copyright. Thus you have to pay thousands of dollars penalty with plenty of  confused. There are many cases like that. Innocent people search and downloaded some thing without being stopped and they have to pay for their “fault”. Well in my opinion, anything involved copyright should not be posted on the internet before it becomes public domain, because internet is a huge stage which is helpful to spread information quickly and at the same time it is also very hard to control. Although it is protected by copyright law, no one can guarantee that it is perfectly safe if people put their property on the internet.
    Internet considered as a free platform where people can share and find something important or necessary to their life. If someone post anything on the internet, people automatically think that they are willing to share with them. If not why post on internet rather than save them in the flash or other place. More over, I don’t think people share within a little group should be treated as copyright infringement even though on the internet. For example, a single mom whose name is Jammie Thomas was accused by record company because of  downloading music illegally and have to pay as much as twenty two thousands dollars in 2006. The website which she downloaded music from named KASA. People sign in and upload music which they are willing to share and download music that other people shared. It was like a big house where family members can share their music. If it is legal that people share in their house then why it is illegal on the internet?
    On the other hand, in order to protect people’s property it is better not to post or upload something that important. “Identity theft statistics are shocking! In the past five years, 1 in 4 Americans was a victim of identity theft making it America's fastest growing crime. Identity theft statistics indicate that this crime costs the government, businesses, and citizens of America billions of dollars each year.(white canyon)”. As modern technology developing, internet was not the safe place anymore. People trying to dig out information from others and use those information to achieve their goal. According to the Sunday Times, the hackers used stolen login details for a Postbank teller and a call center agent to transfer about $6.7 million into multiple bank accounts that were opened across the country late last year(Hackers Steal $6.7 Million in Cyber Bank Robbery).”. Thus from the person who are trying to post something involved copyright or other important information’s view, it is better idea to keep your property away from internet.
    Well no one can deny the fact that internet is a super big platform that can help individual and companies achieve their commercial goal. Even though it is very hard to protect their products from being stolen, they are willing to try to sell those products online. Because internet is so flexible and visional it is very hard to trace the person who steel or downloaded illegally. “The RIAA reports that music sales in the United States have dropped 47 percent since Napster first debuted in 1999. The availability of free music has cost the music industry $12.5 billion in economic losses.( How Does Illegally Downloading Music Impact the Music Industry?)”. Since internet is so complex and huge, avoiding being hake or stolen is impossible. Benefits always go with risk.
    However, in some extent, piracy behavior sometimes helps companies or individual gain benefit indirectly. “Finally, we could try to excuse this piracy with the argument that the piracy actually helps the copyright owner. When the Chinese “steal” Windows, that makes the Chinese dependent on Microsoft. Microsoft loses the value of the software that was taken. But it gains users who are used to life in the Microsoft world. Over time, as the nation grows more wealthy, more and more people will buy software rather than steal it(free culture).”
    In conclusion, I think copyright is very difficult to apply into internet. Where there is someone sharing, there is someone downloading.  People always like free things. If you want to connect internet with your products then prepare to fight a battle. However, like I mentioned above, you may also benefit indirectly. All in all, copyright is not necessary to internet because internet born with free.
Work Cited

Amy Adkins , Demand Media, How Does Illegally Downloading Music Impact the Music Industry?, http://smallbusiness.chron.com/illegally-downloading-music-impact-music-industry-27748.html

Lessig, Lawrence.
Free culture : how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity





-


























2 comments:

  1. 1) Although it is protected by copyright law, no one can guarantee that it is perfectly safe if people put their property on the internet.

    2) The way the writer support his thesis was by give example in the following paragraphs. For example he writen " a single mom whose name is Jammie Thomas was accused by record company because of downloading music illegally and have to pay as much as twenty two thousands dollars in 2006." This was a very good example to support his thesis. His example are every effective as they have a strong link with the thesis.

    3) I would like to see more development in the 3 and 4 paragraph as they seem quite short. Either the writer can interlink the two paragraph or get them indulged with one another. Another thing i have noticed that he has put too quotes in his essay, he didn't talk that much about his point of view on those examples.

    4)There is a counter argument as he is trying to prove that the internet is said to be safe to use but it that's wrong.

    5) He had a smooth flow with the essay. It was really hard to judge if they were in correct order as he has give many examples.

    Overall:

    1) Yes the writer is using relevant sources as he has used most his source from the CSUN library.

    2) Yes, his work cited page is in MLA format.

    ReplyDelete
  2. your thesis statements should be like, " Although (then you write your counter argument), however (then you write why it is not true the, "counter argument") because (then write the reason why)." After the quotation you have to explain the quote because you should show what is the relation between the quote and the topic of the pargraph. I think in academic way most of the cases you shouldn't start your paragraph with a transition word like, "However, and In conclusion." it is good that you have a work citied page, but you should include at least 4 sources, one of them is has to be the, "Free Culture." you included a counter argument in you Thesis, "Although it is protected by copyright law, no one can guarantee that it is perfectly safe if people put their property on the internet" however you didn't write the counter argument paragraph, which i think it would be much better for your essay.

    ReplyDelete